Most regulatory difficulty is foreseeable. The work is to identify what is approaching and to draft what eventually reaches the regulator so it closes lines of inquiry rather than opens new ones.
Regulators are not adversaries. They are readers — usually intelligent, often harried, working under their own institutional pressures, looking at the firm's submissions through the lens of the precedent they will set across the rest of their book. Regulatory counsel is the discipline of writing for that reader.
This is the line between counsel and compliance. A compliance team writes what is true. Counsel writes what is true and coherent and structured to close the question. The same set of facts can be presented in a way that ends a supervisory cycle, or in a way that prolongs it indefinitely. The difference is in the drafting.
The practice spans VARA in the UAE, FINMA in Switzerland, the SFC in Hong Kong, MAS in Singapore and IFSCA in India. The work covers first licensing, supervisory response, key-person preparation, breach reporting, and the quieter category of conversation that happens before any of these become a written matter.
A pre-funding architecture for principal-execution broker-dealers. Client orders above an agreed threshold are pre-funded into segregated client money accounts before the firm takes the corresponding market position. The buffer behind the firm's net liquid asset position is preserved; institutional execution speed is not compromised.
Drafted as a framework that reads as posture rather than remediation. Reusable, with custom thresholds and clauses, for any principal-broker model under VARA, the SFC's Type 1 regime, or the MAS Capital Markets Services regime.
The framework matters because it is a deployable answer to a question every principal-broker eventually faces, drafted under the assumption that the regulator will read the document closely. It is the difference between a licence that operates and a licence that survives quarterly review.
Licence readiness assessed against the regulator's actual reading standards, not the published framework alone.
The structure, sequencing and language of formal responses — drafted to close lines of inquiry, not extend them.
A four-column register paired with a monthly principal-officer note. Reframes the register from an audit artefact into the document the supervisor reads first.
Preparation for the regulator's interview of nominated key persons — content, framing, and the questions that will be asked but not on the agenda.
An honest reading of where the licence sits, with a written remediation roadmap.
Counsel on whether a new product, partnership or transaction will require regulator notification or approval — and how to obtain it cleanly.
A supervisory query has arrived; a licence is approaching renewal; a key person is leaving; a new product needs pre-clearance; or — most often — the client suspects something is wrong but cannot yet name it.
The firm takes on a small number of new retainers each year. First conversations carry no fee and no commitment. They begin with a written introduction.
office@khazanchi.org